RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through
1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay).
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While on extended active duty, in Jul 10, he injured his back
and was released from active duty; however, he should have
remained on active duty until his medical condition was
resolved.
He questioned why he was taken off orders and was told that no
one had picked up the days, so he had to be placed in an INCAP
Pay status. For the next 18 months he had to provide all
medical information to the clinic and have his doctors fill out
forms monthly in order to get paid.
His biggest complaint is that while he was in INCAP Pay status
he did not receive any retirement points.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun 26 Sep 10;
Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) Request Summary;
AF Form 348, Line of Duty Determination (LOD), dated 6 Oct 10;
MEDCON orders for the period, 2 Apr 1 Jun 12; Duty Limiting
Condition Report, dated 12 Feb 13, and various other supporting
documents.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was a member of the West Virginia Air National
Guard (WVANG).
On 2 Jun 10, the applicant was recalled to Extended Active Duty
(EAD) under Title 10, USC §12301(d). On or about (o/a) 1 Jul
10, the applicant was moving construction materials (unloading a
door from the back of a pickup truck and moving a railroad tie)
when he hurt his back. The military medical provider, at Wake
Island, initially identified it as a pulled muscle. O/a, 24 Jul
10, the medical provider noticed worsening symptoms and
significant tenderness in the applicant's lower back and
recommended a referral evaluation be conducted at Hickam AFB.
On 26 Sep 10, the applicant was released from active duty.
On 1 Aug 11, the applicant received INCAP Pay until on or about
27 Mar 12.
On 2 Apr 12, the applicant was placed on EAD to have his
conditions considered through the Integrated Disability
Evaluation System (IDES).
On 17 Jul 12, the applicants request for relief, dated 19 Apr
12, was received.
On 19 Dec 12, the applicants request was administratively
closed advising him that he had not exhausted his administrative
remedies.
On 11 Jun 13, the applicant requested his application be
reopened. He reiterates his original contentions to receive
active duty points rather than INCAP Pay and states that his
previous requests for MEDCON had been denied.
He notes that the governing DoD instructions authorizes a
Reserve member who injures him/herself on active duty, while on
orders of 31 days or more who incurs or aggravates an injury,
illness, or disease in the line of duty shall, with the members
consent, be continued on active duty upon the expiration of call
or order to active duty until the member is determined fit for
duty or the member is separated or retired as a result of a DES
determination.
On 28 Jun 13, the applicant was released from EAD and the WVANG,
by reason of retirement disability, permanent, in the grade of
master sergeant.
On 29 Jun 13, the applicant was permanently disability retired
with a compensable disability rating of 40 percent. He was
credited with 27 years, 10 months, and 9 days of service for
basic pay.
Due to the conflicting documentation in the applicants record
between the available records and the Military Personnel Data
System (MilPDS), the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) will
administratively correct the applicants record to reflect that
he was on EAD from 2 Apr 12 28 Jun 13.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFMOA/SGHI recommends the applicants request for retirement
points for the period 27 Sep 10 to 1 Apr 12 be approved. The
records should be corrected to show his MPA orders were extended
by up to 30-days to initiate an LOD determination and AF Form
469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, when further medical
evaluation was warranted, as set forth in AFI 48-123, Medical
Examinations and Standards.
The complete SGHI evaluation is at Exhibit C.
NGB/A1P concurred with the Subject Matter Expert (SME) and did
not make a recommendation. Since it was unclear whether MEDCON
was actually denied, A1PS advised that the applicant should
contact his unit Medical Group and forward the required
documents for "Initial" MEDCON orders to the Air Reserve
Component Case Management Office so that his MEDCON eligibility
could be validated.
The SME noted that a review of the contents revealed that the
applicants LOD was determined to be In the Line of Duty.·
There were no further medical records for review in this
application. To date, no medical treatment records or duty
restriction documentation has been forwarded or received for
review by NGB/SGPF.
On 10 Jun 11, NGB/SGPF received a request for INCAP Pay and
again on 20 Oct 11, both requests were endorsed. On 27 Mar 12,
a request for MEDCON orders was routed to NGB for consideration.
The Military Personnel Appropriation (MPA) Management Office
(MMO) reviewed the request for eligibility and MEDCON was
approved through 09 Nov 12 by the Air Force Medical Operations
Agency (AFMOA).
The complete A1P evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPFA did not make a recommendation, noting that there were
not enough facts to determine if a mistake, error or unjust
action occurred as a result of determining eligibility or
validation for MEDCON. DPFA noted that the applicant had a
valid line of duty determination which would have authorized
access to care through the Department of Defense (DoD) Military
Treatment Facilities (MTFs). The applicant was authorized and
approved for INCAP Pay by NGB/A1 based on injuries sustained
during Title 10 service. He was also placed on MEDCON orders
while recently undergoing review within the IDES.
The complete DPFA evaluation is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Since the application was previously closed, copies of the Air
Force evaluations were not forwarded to the applicant until
19 Sep 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
corrective action. According to SGHI, the applicant had a Line
of Duty (LOD) initiated on 1 July 2010 which was subsequently
approved by his wing commander on 8 Oct 10. However, contrary
to established guidance dictating that he remain in an active
duty status until his medical condition was resolved he was
placed in an INCAP Pay status and therefore did not receive the
appropriate retirement points. Therefore, we recommend that he
be placed on medical continuation orders for the period 27 Sep
10 to 1 Apr 12, rather than being in an INCAP status. We note
that based on the recommended corrections to his record, any
back pay may be offset by any INCAP or active duty pay he
received. Accordingly, we recommend his record be corrected as
indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that for the
period 27 September 2010 through 1 April 2012, he was placed on
active duty, for the purposes of medical continuation in
accordance with Title 10, U.S.C. §12301(h), rather than
authorization for incapacitation pay.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03094 in Executive Session on 15 May 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.
Although Ms. OSullivan chaired the panel, in view of her
unavailability, Mr. Barany has signed as Acting Panel Chair. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Apr 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Available Master Personnel Record.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFMOA/SGHI, dated 13 Sep 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 1 Oct 12, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPFA, dated 22 Jul 13.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 13.
Acting Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03992
In this respect, we note the applicant was on active duty orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and was diagnosed with a medical injury. While the applicant requests continuation of his active duty orders for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11, we concur with the recommendation of AFMOA/SGHI to correct the record to reflect the applicant was retained on active duty orders for the period 19 Jun 11 to 27 Jul 11. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00805
However, the MEDCON orders were not completed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPF recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02179
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available evidence of record and the letter provided by the Air Force Medical Operations Agency (AFMOA), the applicant was recalled to EAD during the period of 27 Aug 10 to 24 Feb 11. The applicant was approved for INCAP pay; documents show a start date of 11 Jun 11 through 21 Aug 11. The requirement for MEDCON orders, at the time he was requesting an extension of his orders, is that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639
There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicants request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05257
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial, indicating the applicants initial request for MEDCON orders ended due to him failing to provide further documentation for his medical condition. Additionally, the applicant may have been receiving VA...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01410
Upon returning from his AD deployment in 2012 he was denied Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders and pay by his medical group, and he should have been considered for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). On 12 Dec 12, the Connecticut IG rendered a determination that the applicants contested injury was incurred while serving on AD, and, as he was found fit for duty, no MEDCON orders were warranted. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05621
His first LOD was informal; the second LOD was initiated to validate continuation on active duty; the LOD, prognosis and a plan of care must be submitted every 45 days; however, there was some confusion with the process, so his request for MEDCON was not submitted until his active duty orders had ended. The complete DPFA evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/SGPA recommends denial, noting a request for MEDCON orders requires medical documentation to support and validate a request. We note that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02068 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He acquire retirement points during the Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay) period of 20 Oct 12 20 Apr 13. He was temporarily placed on INCAP Pay while waiting for his Line of Duty (LOD) paperwork to be completed and was supposed to have been placed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01000
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01000 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for the period 17 Sep 11 to 30 Jul 12; or in the alternative she receive Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay for the period she was released from MEDCON orders. In accordance with AFRCI 36-3004, Incapacitation...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04977
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04977 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was not released from active duty on 2 Sep 11, but was instead retained on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until 16 Nov 11. Severalattempts were made to secure MEDCON orders with no responses...